• Reset your password

User account menu

  • Log in
Home
Drupal 11 - DO NOT USE THIS SITE TO REGISTER OR TO BECOME MEMBER!!

Main navigation

  • Contacts
  • Old Albums
  • New Albums
  • Archives
  • Files
  • Forums
  • Recent Forum Comments
  • Links
  • Films
  • Notary
  • Map

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Forums
  • Genealogy Research
  • Where are images for Nochistlan Marriages 1628-1633?

Where are images for Nochistlan Marriages 1628-1633?

Profile picture for user Claudia_Reynoso
By Claudia_Reynoso | 9:26 PM MST, Mon May 23, 2011

Hi all!
Does anyone know where I can find images for the records in Nochistlan, marriages between 1628 and 1633? They seem to be out of order at Familysearch.

As an example, I am looking for the following (among others):
1) Rodrigo de Carabajal y Ulloa & Juana Lomelin, m. 12 Sep 1628
2) Bernardino (González) de Isla & Mariana (Moscoso y) Sandoval, m. 21 Apr 1631
3) Juan de Carabajal & Jacinta (Yáñez) de Oliva, m. 25 Jun 1633

Please advise if you know.

Gracias!

gpf13

14 years ago

Permalink

Nochistlan is mixed up!

Claudia

I found your records! But before I tell you where, here's what I did.

I looked up your people in the old Family Search, and it said they were on film 226724 (batch M606255). When I opened the film for 1627-86, I noted that it had the film number 226724, so it should be the right film. It started at the right time, but your people aren't at the beginning.

I then looked at the first film of baptisms (as these are sometimes together with the early marriages). The film had a different FHL number. So they shouldn't be there. I then looked at the next film of marriages; it also had a different FHL number, so they couldn't be there, and had to be on the marriages film for 1627-86.

The beginning of the film did not have page numbers, so it is not ibvious that pages are missing, but the data were sequential, so that is unlikely.

I scanned through the film, and discovered it is at least two volumes (volume 2 starts at image 181). The beginning date was earlier than the ending date of the prior volume.

I also noticed that the marriages at the beginning of the film seem to be indians and not Spanish.

This suggested to me that there is likely a separate set of records for the Spanish. The only option then was to scan through the film (I jumped 20-25 pages at a time). Or you can go through page by page; not fun, but it is methodical.

Image 141 has 1669 marriages (left side), and blank on the right side.

At image 142 I found don Rodrigo de Carabajal de Ulloa and dona Juana de Lomelin, 12 Sep 1628.

At image 143 (left side) is Bernardino and Mariana and (right side) Juan and Jacinta.

I have seen records out of sequence before. Its a nuisance, but you may sometimes have to scan through the whole film. Ocassionally if a film has both the main parish and adjunct chapels, the records for the chapels will be at the end of a month, after the main parish. Or, they may be elsewhere. Sometimes pages are simply out of sequence.

George Fulton
Pleasanton, CA

  • Log in to post comments

Paul Gomez

14 years ago

Permalink

In reply to Nochistlan is mixed up! by gpf13

Nochistlan is mixed up!

George,

You are a very tenacious researcher! I am impressed.

Paul Gomez
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: gpf13@aol.com
Sender: research-bounces@lists.nuestrosranchos.org
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 22:50:25
To:
Reply-to: research@nuestrosranchos.org
Subject: [Nuestros Ranchos] Nochistlan is mixed up!

Claudia

I found your records! But before I tell you where, here's what I did.

I looked up your people in the old Family Search, and it said they were on film 226724 (batch M606255). When I opened the film for 1627-86, I noted that it had the film number 226724, so it should be the right film. It started at the right time, but your people aren't at the beginning.

I then looked at the first film of baptisms (as these are sometimes together with the early marriages). The film had a different FHL number. So they shouldn't be there. I then looked at the next film of marriages; it also had a different FHL number, so they couldn't be there, and had to be on the marriages film for 1627-86.

The beginning of the film did not have page numbers, so it is not ibvious that pages are missing, but the data were sequential, so that is unlikely.

I scanned through the film, and discovered it is at least two volumes (volume 2 starts at image 181). The beginning date was earlier than the ending date of the prior volume.

I also noticed that the marriages at the beginning of the film seem to be indians and not Spanish.

This suggested to me that there is likely a separate set of records for the Spanish. The only option then was to scan through the film (I jumped 20-25 pages at a time). Or you can go through page by page; not fun, but it is methodical.

Image 141 has 1669 marriages (left side), and blank on the right side.

At image 142 I found don Rodrigo de Carabajal de Ulloa and dona Juana de Lomelin, 12 Sep 1628.

At image 143 (left side) is Bernardino and Mariana and (right side) Juan and Jacinta.

I have seen records out of sequence before. Its a nuisance, but you may sometimes have to scan through the whole film. Ocassionally if a film has both the main parish and adjunct chapels, the records for the chapels will be at the end of a month, after the main parish. Or, they may be elsewhere. Sometimes pages are simply out of sequence.

George Fulton
Pleasanton, CA

  • Log in to post comments
Profile picture for user Claudia_Reynoso

Claudia_Reynoso

14 years ago

Permalink

In reply to Nochistlan is mixed up! by gpf13

Nochistlan images - Thank you George!

George, Thanks for solving the puzzle for me. I knew they had to be in there somewhere. Great help from you, as always.

Best,
-C

  • Log in to post comments
Genealogy Research

User login

  • Reset your password

Recent Forum Comments

Subject: test forum topic for announcements
Comment Date: 2024-09-20
Last Comment: Lee Ingram
Subject: test 2
Comment Date: 2024-08-08
Last Comment: Lee Ingram
Subject: test 2
Comment Date: 2024-07-31
Last Comment: Lee Ingram

Most Recent Genealogy Research Forum Topics

2024-08-08
test 2
2024-07-31
test 2
2024-06-19
Jose Cresencio Bugarin

Most Recent History, Culture and General Discussion Topics

2024-04-10
Romo De Vivar: Descendants of the Influential Jewish Family Ha Levi
2024-03-19
Way to show 400 years of family
2023-05-01
DNA Doe Project --- Identification: Parga

Most Recent Announcements and Event Topics

2024-07-18
test forum topic for announcements
2024-06-22
Test Forum message
2024-04-02
New Member

Language switcher

  • English
  • Español
Powered by Drupal

Copyright © 2025 Company Name - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by Alaa Haddad